· Staff & HR  · 10 min read

How to Hire a Head Chef or Executive Chef

Hiring the wrong chef is one of the most expensive mistakes a restaurant owner can make — here is how to define what you need, find serious candidates, and evaluate them before you sign a contract.

Hiring the wrong chef is one of the most expensive mistakes a restaurant owner can make — here is how to define what you need, find serious candidates, and evaluate them before you sign a contract.

The head chef is the single most influential hire you will make. They shape the food, the kitchen culture, the cost structure, and the pace of everything that happens behind the line. When you get this hire right, your entire back-of-house stabilizes. When you get it wrong, you face turnover, inconsistent food, demoralized kitchen staff, and the expensive process of starting over.

Over 25 percent of restaurants report significant difficulty filling kitchen leadership positions, according to 7shifts. That difficulty is not just a pipeline problem — it reflects a genuine shortage of candidates who combine culinary skill, operational discipline, and people management ability at a level appropriate for a head chef role. The search takes longer than it used to, and the cost of a bad hire has never been higher.

This guide walks through the entire process: defining the role precisely, identifying where qualified candidates actually are, structuring your evaluation, and making an offer that retains the person once you find them.

The most common mistake in chef hiring is starting with a vague idea of “someone who can run the kitchen” and hoping to figure out the details later. Write a specific job description before you post anything.

The role description should answer these questions clearly:

What is the kitchen’s actual complexity? A 40-cover bistro with a seasonal menu and three cooks is fundamentally different from a 200-seat full-service restaurant with a kitchen brigade of twelve. The scope of the role defines the experience level you need. A chef who excels in the former may be overwhelmed by the latter.

What is the management responsibility? Some head chef positions are primarily cooking roles with limited administrative oversight. Executive chef positions involve managing the full kitchen team, writing schedules, controlling food costs, developing and executing menus, and often handling vendor relationships. Be explicit about which category you are hiring for.

What is the food cost expectation? According to 7shifts, compensation must be competitive with local market rates, and this goes both ways — you should also communicate the financial performance you expect from the chef. If food cost needs to run at 28 to 32 percent, say so in the hiring process. This filters out candidates who have never managed to a budget.

What is the expected work schedule? Restaurant chef roles typically run 50 to 60 hours per week. Being upfront about this prevents the frustration of onboarding someone who expects a 45-hour week.

The Lightspeed kitchen brigade overview is useful context here. Understanding the brigade hierarchy — executive chef, head chef (chef de cuisine), sous chef, chef de partie, commis — helps you position your open role accurately. If you are hiring a chef de cuisine who will report to an ownership group rather than an executive chef, the candidate needs to own the full scope of kitchen leadership.

Where Qualified Candidates Are Found

Employee Referrals

Your current kitchen staff is your best sourcing channel. They know people. They know who is good, who is difficult to work with, and who has been talking about wanting a head chef opportunity. A referral bonus program — typically $200 to $500 paid after the new hire completes 90 days — incentivizes your team to recruit actively and surfaces candidates who come pre-vetted for cultural fit. For more on building referral programs into your broader hiring process, see our recruitment guide.

Referrals from kitchen staff carry especially high signal because kitchen workers understand better than anyone what the role actually requires day-to-day. If three of your current cooks independently recommend someone, that consensus matters more than a polished resume.

Culinary School Pipelines

Culinary school career offices are underutilized by most restaurants. Programs at Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts, the Culinary Institute of America, Le Cordon Bleu, and local community college culinary programs maintain active alumni networks and placement services. These connections give you access to recent graduates who bring current technique knowledge and formal food safety training.

The tradeoff is experience. Culinary graduates bring solid foundational skills and enthusiasm but typically lack the speed, stamina, and crisis management capacity that comes from years of professional service. For a sous chef or station chef role, culinary school pipelines are excellent. For a head chef position at a high-volume operation, you generally want candidates with several years of post-school professional kitchen experience.

Social Media and Digital Platforms

Instagram has become a significant recruitment channel for kitchen talent. Chefs document their work, build followings, and signal their culinary philosophy through their posts. Searching relevant hashtags in your city and engaging with local culinary accounts surfaces candidates who are serious about their craft. LinkedIn works for more senior executive chef positions where candidates have built professional profiles.

Job boards — Indeed, Culinary Agents, Poached, Craigslist in culinary categories — generate volume. Post your opening with complete compensation information. According to Indeed’s hiring trends data, job listings with transparent pay ranges generate significantly higher application rates. Hiding the salary range does not protect you from candidates with unrealistic expectations — it just reduces your application volume.

Staffing Agencies

Culinary staffing agencies handle the sourcing, screening, and initial interview steps on your behalf. 7shifts pegs the cost at 10 to 20 percent of the hired employee’s annual salary, which for a head chef earning $65,000 works out to $6,500 to $13,000 as a placement fee. That is expensive, but it may be justified if your own recruitment efforts are consuming significant management time with poor results.

If you use an agency, be specific about your requirements. Give them your full job description, your compensation range, your timeline, and your non-negotiables. A generic request for “an experienced chef” will generate generic candidates.

PlayPlay

Screening Resumes and Initial Calls

Look for specific indicators on resumes rather than job titles. The questions to answer from a resume:

  • How long did they stay in each position? Consistent tenure of two-plus years per role is a positive signal. A pattern of six-month stints across five restaurants in three years warrants questions.
  • What type of operations have they worked in? Someone with exclusively fine-dining experience may struggle in a high-volume casual environment, and vice versa. The segment match matters.
  • Have they managed others, or only cooked? Management experience — scheduling, training, food cost oversight — is distinct from cooking skill and must be explicitly present in the background for a head chef role.
  • Do they have relevant certifications? ServSafe Manager certification signals commitment to food safety standards. Other certifications in specific cuisines or techniques indicate depth of focus.

A 15-minute phone screen before inviting anyone to an in-person interview filters efficiently. Ask directly: what is your current compensation, and what are you looking for? What availability do you have, and when could you start? What is your management experience with kitchen teams? These questions surface mismatches early without consuming hours of in-person interview time.

The Working Interview (Stage)

No resume, no phone call, and no sit-down interview tells you as much as watching a candidate cook in your kitchen. The stage — or working interview — is the professional culinary world’s standard evaluation method, and it is indispensable for kitchen hiring.

Structure the stage deliberately. Give the candidate a clear brief: what they will be cooking, what equipment is available, what your standards are, and how long they have. 7shifts emphasizes that the stage reveals things an interview cannot: speed under pressure, technique under observation, cleanliness habits, organization instincts, and how they interact with your existing kitchen team.

What you are watching for during a stage:

Station setup. Does the candidate organize their mise en place logically? Do they work clean throughout, or do they let their station deteriorate during production? A chef who cooks clean cooks efficiently.

Technique fundamentals. Basic knife skills, sauce consistency, protein cooking — these foundational skills should be demonstrated confidently. Candidates who struggle with basics are unlikely to lead a team effectively.

Communication with the team. How do they speak to your existing cooks? Do they ask questions or make assumptions? Are they deferential to your current team structure, or do they immediately assert dominance? Neither extreme is ideal — you want someone who respects existing relationships while also demonstrating authority.

Problem response. Stage scenarios do not always go perfectly. Equipment fails, ingredients are missing, timing is off. A candidate’s response to these moments reveals their disposition under pressure more than their performance during smooth stretches.

Pay a fair stage fee — at minimum minimum wage for the hours they work, and ideally more for a senior candidate. This is standard industry practice and reflects respect for their time and skill.

Compensation: What the Market Actually Requires

According to 7shifts’ salary benchmarking data compiled from Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter, and Salary.com, annual salary ranges in 2026 break out as follows:

  • Quick-service restaurant head chefs: $45,000 to $55,000
  • Casual and fast-casual head chefs: $52,000 to $65,000
  • Full-service restaurant head chefs: $60,000 to $75,000
  • Fine dining executive chefs: $70,000 to $90,000

Geographic location affects these numbers by up to 40 percent. Washington DC, California, and Massachusetts represent the highest-paying markets. If you are in a high cost-of-living city, the fine dining range can extend well above $90,000 for experienced executive chefs at destination restaurants.

An important context: restaurant general managers and executive chefs typically work 55 to 60 hours per week. At 60 hours per week, a chef earning $70,000 annually works out to approximately $22.50 per hour — which should inform how you think about the offer relative to other industries competing for talented people.

Beyond base salary, competitive chef compensation packages often include:

  • Performance bonuses tied to food cost targets (a chef who consistently runs food cost at 28 percent instead of 32 percent creates real value; share some of it)
  • Health insurance (increasingly treated as a baseline expectation, not a perk)
  • Paid time off (minimum two weeks for any senior hire)
  • Staff meal provisions and dining privileges
  • A clear path to review and salary adjustment at 6 months

If your compensation package is below market, expect either a longer search or lower-caliber candidates. The qualified chefs who are worth hiring have options.

Checking References Seriously

Reference checks are often treated as a formality. They should not be. Call previous employers directly — not the references the candidate provides (who will always say positive things), but the general manager or chef the candidate reported to.

Ask specific questions: How did this person manage the kitchen team? How did they handle food cost? What would you say to someone considering hiring them? Would you hire them back, and if not, why?

A candidate who refuses to provide direct-contact references, or whose references are consistently vague about specifics, warrants caution. Strong candidates can point to specific employers who will speak directly and positively about their work.

The First 90 Days

Once you have made the hire, the work is not done. 7shifts notes that attitude and cultural fit matter as much as technical skill since cooking skills can be developed but work ethic and teamwork are harder to teach. This principle applies to the chef as well — help your new hire integrate into your operation’s culture and systems rather than assuming they will figure it out.

Set explicit expectations for the first 90 days: get to know every team member, master the existing menu before proposing changes, demonstrate the food cost management capability they claimed to have, and build relationships with key vendors. Review at 30, 60, and 90 days.

→ Read more: Kitchen Apprentice Programs A chef who performs well in the first 90 days almost always becomes a long-term asset; a chef who struggles in the first 90 days rarely turns around.

The investment in getting the chef hire right — the time, the stage fees, the competitive compensation — is one of the best returns available to a restaurant owner.

Tilbake til alle artikler

Relaterte artikler

Se alle artikler »
Reducing Staff Turnover in Restaurants: A Data-Driven Playbook

Reducing Staff Turnover in Restaurants: A Data-Driven Playbook

The average restaurant churns through 75-80% of its workforce every year. That is not a staffing problem — it is a profit leak. This guide breaks down exactly why people leave, what it costs you, and the proven strategies that bring turnover down to a manageable level.