Music Licensing for Restaurants: ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, and What You Actually Need

Music is one of the cheapest and most effective tools you have for creating atmosphere. The right playlist transforms a space. The wrong legal approach to that playlist can cost you thousands of dollars and create legal headaches that eat far more time and money than the licenses ever would have.

This is a topic where operators consistently fall into expensive misunderstandings — thinking that paying for Spotify means they can play it commercially, or that they only need one license, or that a small restaurant does not need to bother. Let us clear all of that up.

The Legal Foundation: What “Public Performance” Means

When you play music in your restaurant — through speakers, from a streaming service, on a television, or via live performers — you are conducting what copyright law classifies as a “public performance.” Public performances of copyrighted music require a license from the organizations that represent those songwriters and publishers. This is federal copyright law, not a technicality.

The organizations that collect these royalties and issue these licenses are called Performing Rights Organizations, or PROs. There are three major PROs in the United States:

ASCAP (American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers), founded in 1914, is the second largest US PRO with a library exceeding 18 million works. According to Rockbot’s music licensing guide, ASCAP is the longest-serving PRO and represents a catalog that includes many of the most commercially prominent songs.

BMI (Broadcast Music, Inc.), founded in 1939, operates as a nonprofit and represents over 1.2 million registered publishers, composers, and songwriters. BMI’s catalog is particularly strong in certain genres and represents a different set of rights holders than ASCAP.

SESAC is the smallest of the three organizations, covering approximately 400,000 works by roughly 30,000 songwriters. Despite its smaller size, SESAC’s catalog includes commercially significant artists and songs that are entirely absent from ASCAP and BMI catalogs.

Here is the critical point: you need licenses from all three. Because each PRO represents a completely different set of songwriters and publishers, a license from ASCAP does not cover BMI-controlled songs, and vice versa. Since you cannot guarantee which PRO controls any given song that might be played in your restaurant on any given night, you need blanket licenses from all three to be genuinely protected.

What Licenses Actually Cost

The Rockbot analysis reports that basic annual licensing fees for background music total less than $470 per year for all three PROs combined. ASCAP licenses run approximately $200 to $400 annually for background music in a restaurant setting; BMI charges similar rates; SESAC fees are comparable though slightly different based on their catalog size.

These fees vary based on restaurant capacity, square footage, and how music is used. A 50-seat cafe pays less than a 200-seat dining room. Background music costs less than featured entertainment. No live music costs less than a venue with weekly live performances.

The escalation happens with live music. When bands or solo performers play in your restaurant, the licensing fees increase substantially based on how many nights per week you offer live music and whether you charge a cover. Live music licensing can push annual fees to thousands of dollars rather than hundreds. The important thing to understand is that the licensing obligation falls on the restaurant, not the performing musicians — when a band plays copyrighted songs in your space, your restaurant is responsible for having the performance license.

The Small Restaurant Exemption

Federal copyright law does include an exemption for small establishments, but it is narrowly defined. According to Rockbot’s legal analysis, the exemption applies only to restaurants:

Smaller than 3,750 gross square feet
Playing music transmitted via radio, television, cable, or satellite (not a playlist or streaming service)
Without charging customers specifically to hear the music
With no more than 6 external speakers (or 4 per room)
With no more than 4 TVs under 55 inches

If your restaurant exceeds any of these thresholds — including size, speaker configuration, or the source of the music — the exemption does not apply. Most restaurants playing a curated Spotify playlist rather than a radio station are already outside the exemption regardless of their size. The exemption is specifically about broadcast radio and TV, not streaming services.

What Does Not Cover You: The Spotify Problem

This is the most common and expensive misunderstanding in restaurant music compliance: a personal Spotify, Apple Music, or Pandora subscription is licensed for personal, non-commercial listening only. Using it in a commercial setting like a restaurant is a violation of both the streaming service terms of service and federal copyright law.

Your personal streaming subscription fees go to the streaming platform and are distributed (in complex ways) to rights holders. They do not include a blanket commercial performance license. When you play Spotify through your restaurant speakers, you need PRO licenses separately — and the streaming service cannot provide those.

How PROs Enforce This

PROs actively enforce their rights. According to Rockbot’s analysis, they maintain staff who visit restaurants and other businesses to verify compliance — making site visits, sending letters, and making phone calls. This is not a theoretical risk; it is an active enforcement program.

If infringement is confirmed and a business does not obtain a license, the PRO will pursue legal action. The statutory damages structure under federal copyright law allows courts to award $750 per song infringed, plus attorney fees. Given that a busy restaurant might play hundreds of songs in an evening, the potential damages from a successful infringement action can be large. The National Restaurant Association recommends that all restaurants verify their music licensing compliance as a standard operational matter.

Obtaining licenses after receiving a cease-and-desist demand is possible but more expensive and more stressful than simply having them from the beginning. The total cost of three PRO licenses — under $470 per year for a typical small restaurant — is genuinely modest insurance against a legal exposure that could cost multiples of that in a single lawsuit.

The Modern Simplified Option: Commercial Streaming Services

The practical path for most restaurant operators is to use a commercial music streaming service that bundles PRO licensing into their subscription. Services like Rockbot, Soundtrack Your Brand, and Cloud Cover Music include licenses for all three PROs as part of their monthly fee.

These services offer several advantages beyond compliance:

No need to manage three separate PRO relationships or remember renewal dates
Curated commercial-use playlists designed for different restaurant environments and dayparts
Dayparting capability to automatically shift from morning playlist to lunch music to evening atmosphere
Professional curation that produces better background music than most operators would create themselves
Central management from a phone or laptop if you have multiple locations

The monthly subscription cost for a commercial service is typically in the range of $20-$50 per location per month, which is competitive with the combined annual PRO license costs divided monthly. For most operators, the convenience of the bundled compliance solution and the curation quality justify the slightly different cost structure.

Practical Next Steps for New Operators

If you are opening a restaurant and have not addressed music licensing:

If you are using any personal streaming service in your space, stop. Either get PRO licenses or sign up for a commercial music service. Budget this alongside your other startup costs.
If you plan to remain on a standard streaming service with self-curated playlists, obtain blanket licenses from ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC directly. Budget under $470 annually for background-music-only use.
If you plan to offer live music, factor in higher licensing costs and plan that part of your program carefully before committing to a schedule.
If you want the simplest path that handles all of this automatically, evaluate Rockbot, Soundtrack Your Brand, or Cloud Cover Music. Paying a monthly fee to have compliance handled for you is a reasonable tradeoff.

The music in your restaurant creates atmosphere that affects how long guests stay, how much they enjoy their experience, and whether they come back. Protecting that asset legally is straightforward and not expensive. There is no good reason to leave it unaddressed.

→ Read more: Restaurant Ambiance and Atmosphere

→ Read more: Restaurant Lighting and Ambiance